Week 3 Conference Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Week 3 Conference - Essay ExampleThis order was issued on 13 November 2001.I do not associate that the military tribunal provide opusal effective fully because they do not provide tor the right of the due process of lawfulness that has been accorded to all accused persons in the United States. In that, any prove or testimony from previous trials can be admissible during the trial, which I not the case in the criminal civil courts that means that the tried person is not accorded the right to due process. According to the constitution adopted in 1787 gave the president who is the command in chief of the armed forces power to determine and visit warfare crimes committed by the offenders and the terrorist. (Article 1, section 8, clause10).In the case of Exparte Milligan (1866), the court illustrated that the constitution protects the law of the land. It as well as tried to justify the fact that every person should get a fair trial. Where upon Appeal it was held that Milligan shoul d have been tried in a regular court, and not a military tribunal as the law protects every persons and they are equal.Korematsu had a right of fair treatment as any other American resident but since he was Japanese, the government activity felt that they had a right to protect their country during war times. Moreover, if they saw him as a threat then they had a right to send him away from his menage where he had refused to come out of, as he believed it was his right. The court felt that it was impossible from them to separate the partner from the foe or the royal and the disloyal as Korematsu was from the imperial Japan. This was the same case as the Chinese where they were denied to open laundry places at this time.The exclusion order 9066 at that time that is the 1942 to 1944 was seen as constitution because the courts sided with the government as they were trying to protect the country during the time of war. It was also held that the individual right of Mr. Fred was not as important as the rights of